Knowledge Asset Repository
Design, develop, and adopt a knowledge asset repository (including a defined structure and a method for content representation) to facilitate access to knowledge assets. Record and communicate the location of available knowledge assets.
Improvement Planning
Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)
Representative POMs are described for Knowledge Asset Repository at each level of maturity.
- 1Initial
- Practice
- No practices expected for defining a knowledge asset repository.
- Outcome
- The need for a knowledge asset repository.
- Metric
- No metrics.
- 2Basic
- Practice
- Establish a project team that defines the criteria for the knowledge content.
- Outcome
- Project team established.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming project team is established. # of experienced managers committed to the definition of the criteria for the knowledge content. Yes/No indicators confirming defined criteria for the knowledge content.
- Practice
- Define the criteria for the structure and representation of knowledge content, supporting directories, and the subset of knowledge assets.
- Outcome
- Criteria is defined.
- Metric
- # of valid structural levels of the knowledge content is defined and agreed. # of valid representation layers of the knowledge content is defined and agreed. # of levels for the subset of knowledge assets. # of man-hours committed by the project team. Yes/No indicators confirming matching criteria is defined for supporting directories.
- Practice
- Define the knowledge asset repository project.
- Outcome
- The knowledge asset repository project is defined.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming the knowledge asset repository project is defined. % of budget approved for the project.
- 3Intermediate
- Practice
- Establish project teams at enterprise level to develop knowledge asset repository prototypes.
- Outcome
- Project teams are established.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming project teams are established to carry out development of knowledge asset repository prototypes. # of project teams assigned.
- Practice
- Ensure project teams assigned to the development of knowledge asset repository prototypes collaborate at enterprise level.
- Outcome
- Collaboration (and the associated mechanisms) is established.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming project teams are collaborating at enterprise level.
- Practice
- Develop knowledge asset repository prototypes using specified criteria.
- Outcome
- Knowledge asset repository prototypes developed.
- Metric
- % of the KAM budget allocated to development of knowledge asset repository prototypes. # of prototypes developed. # of developed prototypes that meet specified criteria. % of cost of prototype development compared to allocated budget. # of man-hours committed to prototype development per project team.
- Practice
- Use experienced subject matter experts and senior IT managers to select repository prototypes using specified criteria.
- Outcome
- Knowledge asset repository prototypes selected.
- Metric
- # of valid prototypes presented for selection # of experienced subject matter experts in the prototype selection process # of experienced senior IT managers in the prototype selection process # of selected prototypes that meet specified criteria
- Practice
- Deploy selected knowledge asset repository prototypes in pilot projects.
- Outcome
- Pilot projects implemented.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming pilot projects for selected prototypes
- 4Advanced
- Practice
- Ensure that an assigned project team evaluates and improves the configuration of the selected repositories based on specified criteria (such as design, structure, representation and performance).
- Outcome
- Evaluation and improvement of the configuration of the selected repositories is achieved.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming project team is in place. Yes/No indicators confirming evaluation criteria is specified and applied for the selected repository. % completeness of the design and representation of the repository. % customisability of the repository. # of configuration problems identified. # of configuration problems resolved. % of configuration improvements made in the evaluation process.
- Practice
- Define codified directories.
- Outcome
- Codified directories are defined.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming definition of codified directories.
- Practice
- Deploy a common repository structure in multiple areas of the enterprise.
- Outcome
- Deployment of a common repository structure (in multiple areas of the enterprise) is achieved.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming deployment of a common repository structure. # of enterprise areas using the deployed common repository structure.
- 5Optimized
- Practice
- Adopt a virtual knowledge asset repository with complete directories across the enterprise.
- Outcome
- Enterprise-wide adoption of the repository with complete directories is achieved.
- Metric
- Yes/No indicators confirming enterprise-wide adoption of the repository with complete directories. % level of functionality. % of recorded repository interruption problems. % of the interruptions resolved on time. % return on investment on the repository.
- Practice
- Continually improve the virtual knowledge asset repository and its directories.
- Outcome
- Optimised design, structure and representation of the virtual knowledge asset repository.
- Metric
- Frequency of optimisation (# of iterations bi-annually or per year). Yes/No indicators confirming periodic redefinition of repository elements (design, structure, representation and performance).