Accountability Assignment
Establish accountability for managing the expenditure of IT budgets.
Improvement Planning
Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)
Representative POMs are described for Accountability Assignment at each level of maturity.
- 2Basic
- Practice
- Assign budgets to key managers.
- Outcome
- Managers are assigned budgets but there may be limited operational data or tools to support their decision-making.
- Metric
- % of budgets adhered to [within specified tolerances].
- 3Intermediate
- Practices
- Ensure all budget categories have clearly identified and accountable owners.
- Provide managers with ready access to data, and sensitivity analysis and scenario modelling tools to support their decision-making.
- Outcome
- Managers can be formally held accountable for budgets.
- Metric
- % of budgets adhered to [within specified tolerances].
- 4Advanced
- Practice
- Consistently enforce accountability for budget management via appropriate issue escalation.
- Outcome
- Managers can automatically escalate out-of-tolerance deviations from the planned budget for corrective action and follow-up investigation, and can apply corrective actions to achieve budgets.
- Metric
- % of budgets adhered to [within specified tolerances].
- 5Optimized
- Practice
- Continually review the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms and provide managers with the authority and tools to make real-time IT budget decisions.
- Outcomes
- Managers can be held accountable for both profiling and managing expenditure, in order to improve budgeting performance.
- Transparent and real-time budget decisions can be facilitated.
- Metric
- % of budgets adhered to [within specified tolerances].