IVI Framework Viewer

Knowledge Asset Repository

B3

Design, develop, and adopt a knowledge asset repository (including a defined structure and a method for content representation) to facilitate access to knowledge assets. Record and communicate the location of available knowledge assets.

Improvement Planning

Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)

Representative POMs are described for Knowledge Asset Repository at each level of maturity.

1Initial
  • Practice
    No practices expected for defining a knowledge asset repository.
    Outcome
    The need for a knowledge asset repository.
    Metric
    No metrics.
2Basic
  • Practice
    Establish a project team that defines the criteria for the knowledge content.
    Outcome
    Project team established.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming project team is established. # of experienced managers committed to the definition of the criteria for the knowledge content. Yes/No indicators confirming defined criteria for the knowledge content.
  • Practice
    Define the criteria for the structure and representation of knowledge content, supporting directories, and the subset of knowledge assets.
    Outcome
    Criteria is defined.
    Metric
    # of valid structural levels of the knowledge content is defined and agreed. # of valid representation layers of the knowledge content is defined and agreed. # of levels for the subset of knowledge assets. # of man-hours committed by the project team. Yes/No indicators confirming matching criteria is defined for supporting directories.
  • Practice
    Define the knowledge asset repository project.
    Outcome
    The knowledge asset repository project is defined.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming the knowledge asset repository project is defined. % of budget approved for the project.
3Intermediate
  • Practice
    Establish project teams at enterprise level to develop knowledge asset repository prototypes.
    Outcome
    Project teams are established.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming project teams are established to carry out development of knowledge asset repository prototypes. # of project teams assigned.
  • Practice
    Ensure project teams assigned to the development of knowledge asset repository prototypes collaborate at enterprise level.
    Outcome
    Collaboration (and the associated mechanisms) is established.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming project teams are collaborating at enterprise level.
  • Practice
    Develop knowledge asset repository prototypes using specified criteria.
    Outcome
    Knowledge asset repository prototypes developed.
    Metric
    % of the KAM budget allocated to development of knowledge asset repository prototypes. # of prototypes developed. # of developed prototypes that meet specified criteria. % of cost of prototype development compared to allocated budget. # of man-hours committed to prototype development per project team.
  • Practice
    Use experienced subject matter experts and senior IT managers to select repository prototypes using specified criteria.
    Outcome
    Knowledge asset repository prototypes selected.
    Metric
    # of valid prototypes presented for selection # of experienced subject matter experts in the prototype selection process # of experienced senior IT managers in the prototype selection process # of selected prototypes that meet specified criteria
  • Practice
    Deploy selected knowledge asset repository prototypes in pilot projects.
    Outcome
    Pilot projects implemented.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming pilot projects for selected prototypes
4Advanced
  • Practice
    Ensure that an assigned project team evaluates and improves the configuration of the selected repositories based on specified criteria (such as design, structure, representation and performance).
    Outcome
    Evaluation and improvement of the configuration of the selected repositories is achieved.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming project team is in place. Yes/No indicators confirming evaluation criteria is specified and applied for the selected repository. % completeness of the design and representation of the repository. % customisability of the repository. # of configuration problems identified. # of configuration problems resolved. % of configuration improvements made in the evaluation process.
  • Practice
    Define codified directories.
    Outcome
    Codified directories are defined.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming definition of codified directories.
  • Practice
    Deploy a common repository structure in multiple areas of the enterprise.
    Outcome
    Deployment of a common repository structure (in multiple areas of the enterprise) is achieved.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming deployment of a common repository structure. # of enterprise areas using the deployed common repository structure.
5Optimized
  • Practice
    Adopt a virtual knowledge asset repository with complete directories across the enterprise.
    Outcome
    Enterprise-wide adoption of the repository with complete directories is achieved.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators confirming enterprise-wide adoption of the repository with complete directories. % level of functionality. % of recorded repository interruption problems. % of the interruptions resolved on time. % return on investment on the repository.
  • Practice
    Continually improve the virtual knowledge asset repository and its directories.
    Outcome
    Optimised design, structure and representation of the virtual knowledge asset repository.
    Metric
    Frequency of optimisation (# of iterations bi-annually or per year). Yes/No indicators confirming periodic redefinition of repository elements (design, structure, representation and performance).