Governance Structures
Establish a governance framework or approach to support programme/project management decision-making and involvement of stakeholders. Define associated reporting lines, and roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities.
Improvement Planning
Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)
Representative POMs are described for Governance Structures at each level of maturity.
- 1Initial
- Practice
- Rely on the best endeavours of available personnel.
- 2Basic
- Practice
- Hold informal discussions between the programme/project sponsor, project manager, and some key stakeholders, in relation to key decisions.
- Outcome
- Decisions may reflect the input of some key stakeholders.
- Metric
- % of decisions made based on discussion.
- Practice
- Establish some key programme/project roles, responsibilities, accountabilities, and reporting lines, typically within IT.
- Outcome
- Ownership of key roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for programmes/projects within IT is fostered.
- Metrics
- # of roles identified.
- % of roles allocated.
- % of roles with allocated responsibilities and accountabilities.
- Practice
- Present some key programme/project reports alongside the normal line reports from departments.
- Outcome
- Visibility on the status of some key programmes/projects is emerging.
- Metric
- Ratio of programme/project reports compared to normal line reports.
- Practices
- Send programme/project updates to key stakeholders at the close of each phase of work.
- Communicate decisions informally, or as an addendum to a meeting agenda.
- Outcome
- Involvement and awareness among key stakeholders is emerging.
- Metrics
- % of programmes/projects that involve stakeholders after each project phase.
- % of stakeholders receiving communications.
- 3Intermediate
- Practices
- Record major decisions (e.g. additional funding approval, scope changes) in the programme/project status report.
- Encourage the programme/project manager or sponsor to determine who is required to make the decisions.
- Outcome
- Transparency and accountability regarding decisions made are improved.
- Metric
- % of decisions documented in status reports.
- Practice
- Clearly define and document roles, responsibilities, accountabilities, and reporting lines, both within the programme/project and the surrounding organizational set up, in IT and some other business units.
- Outcome
- Clear roles, responsibilities and accountabilities make decision processes transparent and speed up decision making.
- Metrics
- # of roles identified.
- % of roles allocated.
- % of roles with allocated responsibilities and accountabilities.
- % of programmes/projects with clear lines of reporting.
- Practices
- Identify a formal sponsor for the programme/project.
- Integrate programme/project reporting with regular business unit reporting.
- Outcomes
- Involvement of a sponsor, and hence a sense of programme/project ownership, is evident, particularly at the programme/project kick-off phase.
- Visibility on the status of programmes/projects is evident in IT and some other business units.
- Metrics
- % of sponsors regularly involved.
- Ratio of programme/project reports compared to normal line reports.
- Practice
- Include representation of stakeholders from IT and other business units on a programme/project steering committee, and provide them with regular progress reports on the programme/project.
- Outcome
- Most stakeholders of the programme/project are involved and aware of key programme/project issues.
- Metrics
- % of programmes/projects that involve stakeholders.
- % of stakeholders receiving communications.
- 4Advanced
- Practice
- Define organization-wide rules that determine which roles must be involved in different types of decisions (e.g. scope changes, additional funding, modification of the programme/project team).
- Outcome
- Clear roles with responsibilities make decision processes transparent and speed up decision making.
- Metrics
- # of decision rules established.
- % of decisions made by an authorized decision maker.
- Practice
- Document details of all required upcoming decisions and record all details of the decisions taken.
- Outcomes
- Most decisions can be taken in meetings.
- Documentation of decisions taken provides transparency and accountability regarding the decisions made.
- Metric
- % of decisions documented.
- Practice
- Introduce an organization-wide/central body that oversees all programmes/projects (e.g. a PMO).
- Outcome
- The central body supports consistency and best practices in programme/project planning, execution, monitoring and reporting.
- Metric
- % programmes/projects reporting to a central body.
- Practices
- Involve formal sponsors regularly throughout the programme/project (e.g. in a steering board).
- Integrate programme/project reporting with organization-wide reporting.
- Outcomes
- Involvement of a sponsor, and hence a sense of programme/project ownership, is evident, throughout the entire programme/project.
- Visibility on the status of programmes/projects is evident organization-wide.
- Metrics
- % of sponsors participating in steering committees.
- Ratio of programme/project reports compared to normal line reports.
- Practice
- Actively involve organization-wide stakeholders in programme/project governance and management, and provide them with regular progress reports.
- Outcomes
- All stakeholders of the programme/project are involved and aware of key programme/project issues.
- Stakeholder commitment is evident.
- Metrics
- % of programmes/projects that involve stakeholders.
- % of stakeholders receiving communications.
- 5Optimized
- Practices
- Identify the most appropriate decision makers based on the characteristics of the situation (e.g. cost, urgency, difficulty, impact) and input from the business ecosystem.
- Ensure documentation of required decisions thoroughly communicates the decision's characteristics, alternative options, and recommendations.
- Outcome
- Fully transparent and predictable decision making structures ensure short cycle times on decisions with clear documentation.
- Metric
- % of decisions made by an authorized decision maker.
- Practices
- Ensure the central body reports to the executive board/sponsors on programme/project performance.
- Encourage the executive sponsors and line managers to proactively drive the optimization of outcomes from each programme/project.
- Outcome
- The central body, executive sponsors and line managers ensure consistency and best practices in programme/project planning, execution, monitoring and reporting, in line with the organization's strategic direction.
- Metric
- % programmes/projects reporting to a central body.
- Practice
- Encourage the formal sponsors to continually review status, to actively promote sponsorship both inside and outside the programme/project and to integrate the programme/project into the line organization.
- Outcome
- Commitment of all stakeholders internal and external to the programme/project is ensured.
- Metrics
- % of sponsors participating in steering committees.
- Ratio of programme/project reports compared to normal line reports.
- Practices
- Actively involve and engage stakeholders, including those in the business ecosystem, in all programme/project-related issues.
- Formally analyse stakeholders for their influence and interest.
- Develop a communications plan to address each stakeholder's needs.
- Outcome
- Involvement of, communication to, and buy-in from all stakeholders is optimized.
- Metrics
- % of stakeholders analysed.
- % of programmes/projects that involve stakeholders.
- % of stakeholders receiving communications.