IVI Framework Viewer

Benefits Planning

C1

Identify, map, and communicate the interdependent outcomes that may affect the business benefits arising from IT-enabled change.

Improvement Planning

Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)

Representative POMs are described for Benefits Planning at each level of maturity.

1Initial
  • Practice
    Quantify cost and benefits in an ad hoc way.
  • Practice
    No formal business case practices in place.
  • Practice
    Identify benefits in an ad hoc way
    Outcome
    Benefits, if identified, are usually only summary financial projections.
2Basic
  • Practice
    Identify benefits at the end outcome level, with basic mapping of benefits.
    Outcomes
    • There is high-level identification of benefits (end outcome level) with simple benefits mapping.
    • Benefits are described in general terms, but not specific enough to achieve a clear focus on their ultimate delivery, measurement or verification.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes that define benefits at least on a high-level.
  • Practice
    Identify metrics, targets, KPIs for some outcomes within benefits maps.
    Outcome
    Some metrics are defined, if not comprehensively and consistently.
    Metric
    % of outcomes with associated metrics.
  • Practice
    Establish a benefits/change register to record forecasted benefits and to define owners and metrics.
    Outcome
    A benefits/change register is used to define each benefit, specify owner accountability, and how the outcome is being measured (metrics).
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes for which a benefits owner is identified.
  • Practice
    Prepare a basic benefits plan for some projects/programmes.
    Outcome
    Basic benefits tracking for some projects/programmes is facilitated.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes that are supported by a benefits plan.
  • Practice
    Make a standard business case a requirement for all IT-enabled investments that balances costs and high-level benefits.
    Outcomes
    • There is a common format for business plans, allowing comparison of investments on a cost/benefit basis.
    • A cost focus is often limited to technology delivery and related costs.
    Metric
    % of investments using approved business case format.
  • Practice
    Identify strategic drivers for benefits realization.
    Outcome
    There is an ability to justify projects/actions in terms of strategic drivers, and the ability to link benefits to those drivers in general terms only.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes where strategic drivers are identified.
3Intermediate
  • Practice
    Establish relevant metrics, targets, and KPIs for most intermediate and strategic outcomes within benefits maps.
    Outcome
    Relevant targets are established for most outcomes.
    Metric
    % of Benefits registers where metrics, targets and KPIs are defined.
  • Practice
    Establish a detailed benefits/change register.
    Outcome
    The benefits/change registers' format and detail are routinely consistent across programmes in terms of specific description, metrics, targets, milestone dates, baselines, metrics and accountabilities.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes that use comprehensive and consistent benefits registers for their projects.
  • Practice
    Prepare a formal benefits plan for most change initiatives (plan includes benefits map and benefits register, and coordinates actions by IT and the Business).
    Outcomes
    • A formal benefits plan (including benefits map and benefits register) is prepared for most change initiatives.
    • There are integrated IT and Business coordinated actions to deliver benefits.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes that are supported by a robust benefits plan.
  • Practice
    Mandate a benefits map and benefits plan as part of the standard business case.
    Outcome
    A robust business plan exists that focuses justification on the achievement of benefits.
    Metric
    % of business cases that include benefits map and benefits plan.
  • Practices
    • Identify and map outcomes, changes and benefits using a structured or recognized mapping technique.
    • Apply mapping either at the programme level or at a broad business benefit level.
    Outcomes
    • There is identification of dependencies between benefits and mapping of benefits to goals.
    • Benefits maps include all outcome and business change dependencies leading to business benefits.
    • Prioritization of the portfolio is now possible based on the benefits map, but not consistently practised.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes that use structured benefits mapping.
  • Practice
    Establish the relationship and interactions between benefits and the changes necessary in the business, technology, processes, the organization, and stakeholders (BTOPS) to achieve the benefits.
    Outcome
    The business changes which are necessary and sufficent for benefits realization are identified and mapped.
    Metric
    % of benefits maps that include required changes in all five categories: Business, Technology, Organization, Process, Stakeholders.
4Advanced
  • Practice
    Forecast cost savings and commit into operational budgets.
    Outcome
    Accountability for benefits delivery is established.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes where forecasts are booked into budgets.
  • Practice
    Use the benefits plan as the driver of the overall project/programme plan.
    Outcome
    The benefits plan is used as the basis for decisions (such as stage-gating) within the overall project/programme plan.
    Metric
    % of project/programme plans that are benefits led.
  • Practice
    Apply benefits mapping at both strategic and programme levels and mandate for benefits plans and business cases.
    Outcomes
    • Detailed benefits maps are used for designated levels of change initiatives.
    • Benefits maps are incorporated into the benefits plan.
    • Benefits maps are routinely used in business plans.
    Metric
    % of the change portfolio with benefits mapping evident in projects, programmes and business plans.
  • Practice
    Prioritize the portfolio of IT investments based on benefits maps.
    Outcome
    Benefit mapping is a key factor in determining the relative priority of new change investment proposals.
    Metric
    % of proposed projects/programmes where benefits are used to determine priority.
  • Practices
    • Formalize a Benefits Plan.
    • Identify relevant metrics, targets and risks associated with all BTOPS changes.
    Outcome
    The benefits plan is used and managed as an integral part of the programme/project plan.
    Metric
    % of programme and project plans with distinct benefits plan included.
5Optimized
  • Practice
    Manage the performance of the portfolio of IT investments based on benefits maps.
    Outcome
    Benefit planning processes are integrated with organization-wide portfolio planning and performance management systems, allowing for continual re-evaluation of both individual programmes and the overall portfolio to optimize benefits and maximize value.
    Metric
    % of projects/programmes where benefits planning processes are integrated with organization-wide planning and performance management systems.