IVI Framework Viewer

Target-Setting and Development Roadmap

B4

Identify IT capability areas in need of improvement. Develop plans to close the gap between the current state and the target. Obtain support for implementing improvement initiatives. Communicate with stakeholders about assessment results, targets, gaps, and roadmap progress.

Improvement Planning

Practices-Outcomes-Metrics (POM)

Representative POMs are described for Target-Setting and Development Roadmap at each level of maturity.

1Initial
  • Practice
    Practices are ad hoc, occurring on a best endeavour basis.
    Outcome
    _
    Metric
    _
2Basic
  • Practice
    Align IT capability targets with technical deliverables.
    Outcome
    There is basic alignment of the targets with IT's direction.
    Metric
    % of YoY expenditure (e.g. $ or FTE) targeting improvements that are approved as a result of assessments.
  • Practice
    Establish a basic process for selecting and prioritizing improvement areas within IT.
    Outcome
    Fundamental areas for improvement can be identified.
    Metric
    # of identified areas for improvement that are prioritized for action. Average time forecasted to achieve target improvement goal.
  • Practice
    Communicate some results and targets to participants and stakeholders.
    Outcome
    Basic communication of results and targets begins to foster buy-in to improvement activities.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators re the existence of and adherence to a process for regularly communicating IT capability assessment results and targets to employees. # of emails/reports/other communication formats used to inform the wider organization of IT capability assessment results and improvement activities.
  • Practice
    Directly assign assessment results to line managers in IT to address identified gaps.
    Outcome
    There is basic responsibility for realizing improvements.
    Metric
    % of identified improvement initiatives that are assigned financial and stakeholder resources. IT capability improvement funding as a % of total expenditure. # and % of IT capability stakeholders with capability improvement responsibilities.
3Intermediate
  • Practice
    Use a target identification process that is consistent across all of IT and that has an overarching, high-level view of other business unit requirements.
    Outcome
    There is an integrated framework in place to allow trade-off comparisons of all assessment results across the organization.
    Metric
    % of YoY expenditure (e.g. $ or FTE) targeting improvements that are approved as a result of assessments.
  • Practice
    Establish a detailed and standardized process for prioritizing improvement areas across IT and some other business units.
    Outcome
    Clear prioritization of improvement areas facilitates communication and realization of improvements.
    Metric
    # of identified areas for improvement that are prioritized for action. Average time forecasted to achieve target improvement goal.
  • Practice
    Take into account industry benchmarks and results from previous assessments when defining improvement goals.
    Outcome
    Assessment results can be interpreted within a context of past results and benchmarks.
    Metric
    % of IT capability targets set that are informed by industry benchmark data.
  • Practice
    Define and agree a standard process (e.g. communication methods, communication frequency, etc.) for communicating results to all participants and stakeholders in IT and some other business units.
    Outcome
    The communication of results and targets within IT and to some other business units fosters greater buy-in to improvement activities.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators re the existence of and adherence to a process for regularly communicating IT capability assessment results and targets to employees. # of emails/reports/other communication formats used to inform the wider organization of IT capability assessment results and improvement activities.
  • Practice
    Establish an improvement support structure (e.g. with senior management commitment and guidance, adequate resource provisioning, etc.) to support implementation of prioritized improvements and achievement of targets set. Make financial and stakeholder resources available for improvements in IT and some other business units.
    Outcome
    An improvement support mechanism allows identified improvements to be successfully implemented in order to achieve business value and reach targets. Fundamental requirements for implementing improvements are in place.
    Metric
    % of identified improvement initiatives that are assigned financial and stakeholder resources. IT capability improvement funding as a % of total expenditure. # and % of IT capability stakeholders with capability improvement responsibilities.
4Advanced
  • Practice
    Align IT capability targets to business deliverables.
    Outcome
    There is alignment of IT capability targets with the strategic direction of the organization
    Metric
    % of YoY expenditure (e.g. $ or FTE) targeting improvements that are approved as a result of assessments.
  • Practice
    Use the standardized prioritization process organization-wide when selecting and prioritizing all improvement areas. Review and revise improvement goals.
    Outcome
    Consistent identification of improvement areas facilitates decisions on assessment deep dives.
    Metric
    # of identified areas for improvement that are prioritized for action. Average time forecasted to achieve target improvement goal. % of IT capability targets set that are informed by industry benchmark data.
  • Practice
    Set up a communications plan for organization-wide results communication and ensure tailored results communication to participants and to senior IT and business stakeholders.
    Outcome
    Structured communication increases commitment and buy-in within the organization, facilitates assessment execution and increases the likelihood of successful improvements.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators re the existence of and adherence to a process for regularly communicating IT capability assessment results to employees. # of emails/reports/other communication formats used to inform the wider organization of IT capability assessment results and improvement activities.
  • Practice
    Standardize the improvement support structure and ensure the necessary financial and stakeholder resources are consistently made available to support implementation of all improvement initiatives organization-wide.
    Outcome
    Recommendations to address gaps or imbalances impacting on capability are considered as part of the wider development of improvement strategies, priorities, and development road maps. The necessary financial and stakeholder resources are in place to support implementation of improvement initiatives organization-wide.
    Metric
    % of identified improvement initiatives that are assigned financial and stakeholder resources. IT capability improvement funding as a % of total expenditure. # and % of IT capability stakeholders with capability improvement responsibilities.
5Optimized
  • Practice
    Regularly update all capability target definitions based on feedback and learning, and align them with the business ecosystem's needs.
    Outcome
    Capability targets are optimized at the technical, organization, and individual levels and reflect the needs of the business ecosystem.
    Metric
    % of YoY expenditure (e.g. $ or FTE) targeting improvements that are approved as a result of assessments.
  • Practice
    Deploy the improvement prioritization process across the business ecosystem and regularly review/update it based on available internal and external insights and learnings.
    Outcome
    The improvement prioritization process is informed by a combination of industry benchmarks, previous assessment results across several iterations of assessment cycles, and reported problems from the business ecosystem.
    Metric
    # of identified areas for improvement that are prioritized for action. Average time forecasted to achieve target improvement goal. % of IT capability targets set that are informed by industry benchmark data.
  • Practice
    Communicate results across the business ecosystem and set up a feedback process for all results communication.
    Outcome
    Continued and widespread buy-in to improvement activities is fostered based on the communication of assessment results.
    Metric
    Yes/No indicators re the existence of and adherence to a process for regularly communicating IT capability assessment results and targets to employees. # of emails/reports/other communication formats used to inform the wider organization of IT capability assessment results and improvement activities.
  • Practice
    Regularly review and optimize the improvement support structure.
    Outcome
    The improvement support structure is capable of supporting the current and future improvement needs of the business ecosystem.
    Metric
    % of identified improvement initiatives that are assigned financial and stakeholder resources. IT capability improvement funding as a % of total expenditure. # and % of IT capability stakeholders with capability improvement responsibilities.